Brand Finance logo

Yili retains title as most valuable dairy brand for sixth consecutive year

27 August 2025
Jump to Media Downloads

Brand Finance’s Food & Drink 2025 report showcases the resilience of Chinese brands despite local market challenges

  • Yili also ranks third among the world’s most valuable food brands
  • Nongfu Spring climbs to third in non-alcoholic drinks ranking, overtaking Red Bull
  • Nongfu Spring also ranked as third strongest non-alcoholic drinks brand globally in 2025

BEIJING, 27 August 2025 – Chinese brands continue to make their mark on the global food and drink stage with Yili (brand value down 3% to USD11.2 billion) retaining its position as the most valuable dairy ranked brand for the sixth consecutive year. The latest Food & Drink 2025 report from Brand Finance, the world’s leading brand valuation consultancy, features three sub-rankings consisting of food, non-alcoholic drinks, and dairy brands.  

Yili also maintained its ranking as the third most valuable food brand worldwide. Brand Finance’s research shows that Yili is widely recognised in China, ranking as a consumer "brand of choice" with high familiarity.

In the non-alcoholic drinks ranking, Nongfu Spring (brand value up 34% to USD11.1 billion) rose to third place, overtaking Red Bull (brand value up 16% to USD9.7 billion). Nongfu Spring also ranks as the third strongest brand in the ranking, with a Brand Strength Index (BSI) score of 91.1/100 and AAA+ brand strength rating. Brand Finance’s market research shows the brand’s performance is bolstered by strong consumer trust, loyalty, and positive recommendations in its home market of China.

Scott Chen, Managing Director, Brand Finance China, commented:

“Chinese food and drink brands are demonstrating that even in times of global sector decline, strong brand equity and consumer trust can fuel resilience. Yili’s consistent top ranking in dairy reflects not only product quality and innovation but also the brand’s ability to adapt to changing domestic market conditions. Likewise, Nongfu Spring’s impressive growth shows the power of deep domestic loyalty translating into global brand strength.”

The report also highlights the performance of other leading Chinese food brands:

  • Mengniu (brand value down 13% to USD4.7 billion), ranked 11th in the food ranking.
  • Haitian (brand value down 15% to USD3.6 billion), ranked 17th in the food ranking.
  • Arawana (brand value up 38% to USD2.5 billion), ranked 29th in the food ranking.
  • Master Kong (brand value up 10% to USD2.4 billion) ranked 33rd in the food ranking.
  • Shineway (brand value down 16% to USD1.4 billion) ranked 60th in the food ranking.

Global Insights

Nestlé maintains its position as the most valuable food brand, marking a decade at the top

Coca-Cola is the most valuable non-alcoholic drinks brand globally

Media Downloads

These images may be downloaded and used for publication. Please attribute to Brand Finance.
Copyright © 2025 Brand Finance. All rights reserved.

Media Contacts

Gayathri Saravana Kumar
Marketing Director - Asia Pacific
Brand Finance

About Brand Finance

Brand Finance is the world’s leading brand valuation consultancy. Bridging the gap between marketing and finance, Brand Finance evaluates the strength of brands and quantifies their financial value to help organisations make strategic decisions.

Headquartered in London, Brand Finance operates in over 25 countries. Every year, Brand Finance conducts more than 6,000 brand valuations, supported by original market research, and publishes over 100 reports which rank brands across all sectors and countries.

Brand Finance also operates the Global Brand Equity Monitor, conducting original market research annually on 6,000 brands, surveying more than 175,000 respondents across 41 countries and 31 industry sectors. By combining perceptual data from the Global Brand Equity Monitor with data from its valuation database — the largest brand value database in the world — Brand Finance equips ambitious brand leaders with the data, analytics, and the strategic guidance they need to enhance brand and business value.

In addition to calculating brand value, Brand Finance also determines the relative strength of brands through a balanced scorecard of metrics evaluating marketing investment, stakeholder equity, and business performance, compliant with ISO 20671.

Brand Finance is a regulated accountancy firm and a committed leader in the standardisation of the brand valuation industry. Brand Finance was the first to be certified by independent auditors as compliant with both ISO 10668 and ISO 20671 and has received the official endorsement of the Marketing Accountability Standards Board (MASB) in the United States.

Definition of Brand

Brand is defined as a marketing-related intangible asset including, but not limited to, names, terms, signs, symbols, logos, and designs, intended to identify goods, services, or entities, creating distinctive images and associations in the minds of stakeholders, thereby generating economic benefits.

Brand Strength

Brand strength is the efficacy of a brand’s performance on intangible measures relative to its competitors. Brand Finance evaluates brand strength in a process compliant with ISO 20671, looking at Marketing Investment, Stakeholder Equity, and the impact of those on Business Performance. The data used is derived from Brand Finance’s proprietary market research programme and from publicly available sources.

Each brand is assigned a Brand Strength Index (BSI) score out of 100, which feeds into the brand value calculation. Based on the score, each brand is assigned a corresponding Brand Rating up to AAA+ in a format similar to a credit rating.

Brand Valuation Approach

Brand Finance calculates the values of brands in its rankings using the Royalty Relief approach – a brand valuation method compliant with the industry standards set in ISO 10668. It involves estimating the likely future revenues that are attributable to a brand by calculating a royalty rate that would be charged for its use, to arrive at a ‘brand value’ understood as a net economic benefit that a brand owner would achieve by licensing the brand in the open market.

The steps in this process are as follows:

1 Calculate brand strength using a balanced scorecard of metrics assessing Marketing Investment, Stakeholder Equity, and Business Performance. Brand strength is expressed as a Brand Strength Index (BSI) score on a scale of 0 to 100.

2 Determine royalty range for each industry, reflecting the importance of brand to purchasing decisions. In luxury, the maximum percentage is high, while in extractive industry, where goods are often commoditised, it is lower. This is done by reviewing comparable licensing agreements sourced from Brand Finance’s extensive database.

3 Calculate royalty rate. The BSI score is applied to the royalty range to arrive at a royalty rate. For example, if the royalty range in a sector is 0-5% and a brand has a BSI score of 80 out of 100, then an appropriate royalty rate for the use of this brand in the given sector will be 4%.

4 Determine brand-specific revenues by estimating a proportion of parent company revenues attributable to a brand.

5 Determine forecast revenues using a function of historic revenues, equity analyst forecasts, and economic growth rates.

6 Apply the royalty rate to the forecast revenues to derive brand revenues.

7 Discount post-tax brand revenues to a net present value which equals the brand value.

Disclaimer

Brand Finance has produced this study with an independent and unbiased analysis. The values derived and opinions presented in this study are based on publicly available information and certain assumptions that Brand Finance used where such data was deficient or unclear. Brand Finance accepts no responsibility and will not be liable in the event that the publicly available information relied upon is subsequently found to be inaccurate. The opinions and financial analysis expressed in the study are not to be construed as providing investment or business advice. Brand Finance does not intend the study to be relied upon for any reason and excludes all liability to any body, government, or organisation.

The data presented in this study form part of Brand Finance's proprietary database, are provided for the benefit of the media, and are not to be used in part or in full for any commercial or technical purpose without written permission from Brand Finance.

Get in Touch

Message