New Brand Finance data shows Sri Lanka gaining ground globally as a recommended destination to invest in, work in, and visit, while retaining its distinctive strength in tourism and culture
COLOMBO, 27 January 2026 – Sri Lanka ranks 100th globally in the Global Soft Power Index (GSPI) 2026 with a score of 33.8/100, down three positions from 97th in 2025, according to a new iteration of the Global Soft Power Index by Brand Finance.
Brand Finance publishes the Global Soft Power Index based on a survey of more than 150,000 respondents from over 100 countries to gather data on global perceptions of all 193 member states of the United Nations. Thanks to the scope of the survey, the Index is the world’s most comprehensive study on perceptions of nation brands, providing an in-depth analysis of the evolving status of Soft Power as nations navigate significant global changes and challenges.
Soft Power is defined as a nation’s ability to influence the preferences and behaviours of various actors in the international arena (states, corporations, communities, publics, etc.) through attraction and persuasion rather than coercion. Each nation is scored across 55 different metrics to arrive at an overall score out of 100 and ranked in order from 1st to 193rd.
While Sri Lanka’s overall Soft Power ranking declined this year, the results reflect a mixed performance, with selective improvements emerging alongside persistent structural weaknesses. Perceptions of ease of doing business in and with Sri Lanka improved, aligning with easing inflation and lower borrowing costs. These shifts supported improved access to capital and stronger perceptions of economic stability, contributing to more favourable views of Sri Lanka as a destination to invest, work, study, and visit. Tourism and people-led indicators remain key sources of resilience, with Sri Lanka rising 8 places as ‘a great place to visit’, improving 10 places for food the world loves’, and climbing 13 places for friendliness. More modest gains in Education & Science indicate gradual strengthening.
Despite these gains, Sri Lanka’s overall Soft Power ranking declined, reflecting persistent structural weaknesses. Improvements in economic and people-facing perceptions have not been matched by progress in governance-related views. Global perceptions of governance deteriorated, signalling a disconnect between macroeconomic stabilisation and institutional reform. Sri Lanka’s influential media ranking also fell from 104th to 129th, indicating reduced global media presence and influence.
Taken together, the results suggest that while Sri Lanka’s influence and institutional credibility remain under pressure, perceptions tied to communication, culture, and everyday engagement continue to strengthen. These areas increasingly shape how the country is experienced internationally, offering a basis for sustaining visibility and relevance despite broader soft power constraints.
Ruchi Gunewardene, Chairman, Brand Finance Sri Lanka, commented:
“Sri Lanka’s strongest Soft Power gains in 2026 come from perceptions that matter in real life: how easy it is to engage, how welcoming it feels, and how positively it is experienced. Improvements in communication, friendliness, and tourism appeal highlight a nation strengthening relevance through accessibility and cultural familiarity. In a more competitive global landscape, these attributes help reinforce preference and international relevance.”
Global Insights: US Soft Power decline accelerates as Japan overtakes the UK to take 3rd place
The Global Soft Power Index 2026 highlights a broad global decline of nation brand perceptions, driven by economic uncertainty, geopolitical tension, and social pressures. Audiences worldwide are more cautious and more likely to scrutinise nations’ behaviour, leading to lower scores across the Index and echoing the trust erosion seen during the COVID-19 period.
Despite retaining 1st place overall, the United States records the steepest overall decline among all nation brands ranked, driven by sharp declines in Reputation (26th, -11) and key nation brand attributes amid international backlash to “America First” policies. Key declines are observed in friendliness, (-32), generosity, (-68) ease of doing business, (-21) support for climate action (-16), political stability, (-8) human rights, (-10) and ethical standards (-4). Nevertheless, the US retains its number one position for Familiarity and Influence, underpinned by continued global leadership in arts and entertainment, (1st) sport, (3rd) iconic brands, (2nd) innovation, (3rd) and space exploration (1st).
Japan’s rise to 3rd, now overtaking the United Kingdom (4th), exemplifies its ability to build Soft Power through a direct experience of the nation brand. Japan has maintained strengths in Business & Trade (1st), Sustainable Future (1st), Education & Science (2nd), and Governance (2nd), while tourism has boosted Familiarity (6th, +1) and related attributes, including appealing lifestyle (4th, +9), visit appeal (8th, +3), friendliness (7th, +12), and fun (21st, +15).
Konrad Jagodzinski, Place Branding Director, Brand Finance, commented:
“The negative shift in the global mood highlights a critical lesson about Soft Power in 2026. Publics are increasingly sensitive to the alignment of values, actions, and outcomes. Nations that fail to demonstrate reliability, credibility, and impact face erosion not only in specific domains but also in broader international reputation and relevance. Soft power is not solely about visibility or size; it is about perception that a nation is delivering on promises implicit in its brand. Nations failing to uphold these promises are penalised by global audiences.”
Brand Finance is the world’s leading brand valuation consultancy. Bridging the gap between marketing and finance, Brand Finance evaluates the strength of brands and quantifies their financial value to help organisations make strategic decisions.
Headquartered in London, Brand Finance operates in over 25 countries. Every year, Brand Finance conducts more than 6,000 brand valuations, supported by original market research, and publishes over 100 reports which rank brands across all sectors and countries.
Brand Finance also operates the Global Brand Equity Monitor, conducting original market research annually on 6,000 brands, surveying more than 175,000 respondents across 41 countries and 31 industry sectors. By combining perceptual data from the Global Brand Equity Monitor with data from its valuation database — the largest brand value database in the world — Brand Finance equips ambitious brand leaders with the data, analytics, and the strategic guidance they need to enhance brand and business value.
In addition to calculating brand value, Brand Finance also determines the relative strength of brands through a balanced scorecard of metrics, compliant with ISO 20671.
Brand Finance is a regulated accountancy firm and a committed leader in the standardisation of the brand valuation industry. Brand Finance was the first to be certified by independent auditors as compliant with both ISO 10668 and ISO 20671 and has received the official endorsement of the Marketing Accountability Standards Board (MASB) in the United States.
Brand is defined as a marketing-related intangible asset including, but not limited to, names, terms, signs, symbols, logos, and designs, intended to identify goods, services, or entities, creating distinctive images and associations in the minds of stakeholders, thereby generating economic benefits.
Brand strength is the efficacy of a brand’s performance on intangible measures relative to its competitors. Brand Finance evaluates brand strength in a process compliant with ISO 20671, looking at Marketing Investment, Stakeholder Equity, and the impact of those on Business Performance. The data used is derived from Brand Finance’s proprietary market research programme and from publicly available sources.
Each brand is assigned a Brand Strength Index (BSI) score out of 100, which feeds into the brand value calculation. Based on the score, each brand is assigned a corresponding Brand Rating up to AAA+ in a format similar to a credit rating.
Brand Finance calculates the values of brands in its rankings using the Royalty Relief approach – a brand valuation method compliant with the industry standards set in ISO 10668. It involves estimating the likely future revenues that are attributable to a brand by calculating a royalty rate that would be charged for its use, to arrive at a ‘brand value’ understood as a net economic benefit that a brand owner would achieve by licensing the brand in the open market.
The steps in this process are as follows:
1 Calculate brand strength using a balanced scorecard of metrics assessing Marketing Investment, Stakeholder Equity, and Business Performance. Brand strength is expressed as a Brand Strength Index (BSI) score on a scale of 0 to 100.
2 Determine royalty range for each industry, reflecting the importance of brand to purchasing decisions. In luxury, the maximum percentage is high, while in extractive industry, where goods are often commoditised, it is lower. This is done by reviewing comparable licensing agreements sourced from Brand Finance’s extensive database.
3 Calculate royalty rate. The BSI score is applied to the royalty range to arrive at a royalty rate. For example, if the royalty range in a sector is 0-5% and a brand has a BSI score of 80 out of 100, then an appropriate royalty rate for the use of this brand in the given sector will be 4%.
4 Determine brand-specific revenues by estimating a proportion of parent company revenues attributable to a brand.
5 Determine forecast revenues using a function of historic revenues, equity analyst forecasts, and economic growth rates.
6 Apply the royalty rate to the forecast revenues to derive brand revenues.
7 Discount post-tax brand revenues to a net present value which equals the brand value.
Brand Finance has produced this study with an independent and unbiased analysis. The values derived and opinions presented in this study are based on publicly available information and certain assumptions that Brand Finance used where such data was deficient or unclear. Brand Finance accepts no responsibility and will not be liable in the event that the publicly available information relied upon is subsequently found to be inaccurate. The opinions and financial analysis expressed in the study are not to be construed as providing investment or business advice. Brand Finance does not intend the study to be relied upon for any reason and excludes all liability to any body, government, or organisation.
The data presented in this study form part of Brand Finance's proprietary database, are provided for the benefit of the media, and are not to be used in part or in full for any commercial or technical purpose without written permission from Brand Finance.
