Brand Finance logo

ICBC is world’s most valuable banking brand for ninth consecutive year

20 March 2025
Jump to Media Downloads

New Brand Finance data shows 70 Chinese banks hold 29% of total brand value among world's 500 most valuable banking brands

  • Five Chinese banks dominate the global top 10 list
  • Four of top five Chinese banking brands thrive on state support
  • China Construction Bank, Bank of China and ICBC record a stellar AAA+ brand strength rating

BEIJING, 20 March 2025 – China’s banking brands experienced a 6% increase in its year-on-year total brand value which stands at USD476.4 billion this year, according to the latest Banking 500 2025 journal by Brand Finance, the world’s leading brand valuation consultancy.   

ICBC (brand value up 10% to USD79.1 billion) retains its position as the world's most valuable banking brand for the ninth consecutive year, leading the charge of 70 Chinese banking brands in this year’s ranking. The brand also recorded a strong Brand Strength Index (BSI) score of 91.3/100 while maintaining its brand strength rating of AAA+.  

Ranked as the second most valuable banking brand globally, China Construction Bank (brand value up 19% to USD78.4 billion) also recorded an increased BSI score of 93.7/100 from the previous year, raising its brand strength rating to AAA+.

Coming in at third and fourth places globally, Agricultural Bank of China (brand value up 16% to USD70.2 billion) and Bank of China (brand value up 26% to USD63.8 billion), accompanied by brand strength ratings of AAA and AAA+ respectively.

Meanwhile, China Merchants Bank (brand value up 6% to USD28.3 billion), ranks 10th globally, maintaining its strong position among the world’s leading Chinese banks.

Scott Chen, Managing Director, Brand Finance China, commented:  

"Four out of the top five Chinese banking brands benefit from strong state support, allowing them to expand aggressively and align with national economic priorities such as infrastructure projects, Belt and Road Initiative investments, and real estate development. Flexible regulatory policies further enable these banks to sustain high growth despite economic uncertainties. With consumer trust still recovering from the 2023 banking crisis, Chinese banks continue demonstrate resilience by maintaining stability and strengthening their global presence"

Meanwhile, other leading Chinese banking brands featured in the Banking 500 2025 include: 

  • Postal Savings Bank (brand value up 20% to USD21.9 billion)
  • China CITIC Bank (brand value up 27% to USD17 billion)
  • Bank of Communications (brand value down 16% to USD15.4 billion)
  • Shanghai Pudong Development Bank (brand value up 3% to USD10.2 billion)
  • Ping An Bank (brand value down 10% to USD9.6 billion)
  • Industrial Bank (brand value down 17% to USD 8.9 billion)
  • China Minsheng Bank (brand value down 9% to USD 7 billion)
  • China Everbright Bank (brand value down 28% to USD 6.2 billion)
  • Hua Xia Bank (brand value down 34% to USD 3.2 billion)
  • China Guangfa Bank (brand value down 25% to USD 3.1 billion)
  • China Zheshang Bank (brand value down 23% to USD 2.3 billion)
  • Bank of Beijing (brand value down 26% to USD2.6 billion)
  • Bank of Jiangsu (brand value down 48% to USD 2.6 billion)
  • Bank of Ningbo (brand value down 37% to USD 2.1 billion)
  • Bank of Shanghai (brand value down 42% to USD 1.8 billion)
  • Bank of Nanjing (brand value down 37% to USD 1.7 billion)
  • Taipei Fubon Bank (brand value up 20% to USD1.6 billion)
  • Huishang Bank (brand value down 12% to USD 1.5 billion)
  • Bank of Hangzhou (brand value down 49% to USD994 million)
  • Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank (brand value down 40% to USD807 million)
  • Bank Of Changsha (brand value down 46% to USD775 million)
  • Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank (brand value down 53% to USD725 million)
  • Bank of Taiwan (brand value up 47% to USD720.3 million)
  • Guangzhou Rural Commercial Bank (brand value down 19% to USD644 million)
  • China Bohai Bank (brand value down 58% to USD 528 million)
  • Beijing Rural Commercial Bank (brand value down 12% to USD525 million)
  • Bank of Chengdu (brand value down 20% to USD813 million)
  • Bank of Tianjin (brand value down 33% to USD479 million)
  • Land Bank of Taiwan (brand value up 20% to USD457 million)
  • Bank of Qingdao (brand value down 18% to USD438 million)
  • Bank of Suzhou (brand value down 15% to USD423 million)
  • Bank Of Chongqing (brand value down 48% to USD389 million)

Banking Industry Global Insights 

The total brand value of the world’s 500 most valuable banking brands has surged by 13% year-on-year to reach USD1.6 trillion, marking the first double-digit increase in four years. This follows two years of sluggish 2% brand value growth and reflects the banking sector's ability to sustain momentum despite market volatility.

UK neobank Revolut is the fastest-growing banking brand globally, with a 795% increase in brand value to USD1.9 billion, driven by strong revenue growth, customer expansion, and significant marketing investment.

Indonesia’s BCA retains its title as the world’s strongest banking brand, with a BSI score of 97.1/100 and an elite AAA+ rating. The ranking reinforces the growing strength of local and regional banks, with many in Asia and Africa excelling in customer trust and digital innovation. 

Media Downloads

These images may be downloaded and used for publication. Please attribute to Brand Finance.
Copyright © 2025 Brand Finance. All rights reserved.

Media Contacts

Gayathri Saravana Kumar
Marketing Director - Asia Pacific
Brand Finance

About Brand Finance

Brand Finance is the world’s leading brand valuation consultancy. Bridging the gap between marketing and finance, Brand Finance evaluates the strength of brands and quantifies their financial value to help organisations make strategic decisions.

Headquartered in London, Brand Finance operates in over 25 countries. Every year, Brand Finance conducts more than 6,000 brand valuations, supported by original market research, and publishes over 100 reports which rank brands across all sectors and countries.

Brand Finance also operates the Global Brand Equity Monitor, conducting original market research annually on 6,000 brands, surveying more than 175,000 respondents across 41 countries and 31 industry sectors. By combining perceptual data from the Global Brand Equity Monitor with data from its valuation database — the largest brand value database in the world — Brand Finance equips ambitious brand leaders with the data, analytics, and the strategic guidance they need to enhance brand and business value.

In addition to calculating brand value, Brand Finance also determines the relative strength of brands through a balanced scorecard of metrics evaluating marketing investment, stakeholder equity, and business performance, compliant with ISO 20671.

Brand Finance is a regulated accountancy firm and a committed leader in the standardisation of the brand valuation industry. Brand Finance was the first to be certified by independent auditors as compliant with both ISO 10668 and ISO 20671 and has received the official endorsement of the Marketing Accountability Standards Board (MASB) in the United States.

Definition of Brand

Brand is defined as a marketing-related intangible asset including, but not limited to, names, terms, signs, symbols, logos, and designs, intended to identify goods, services, or entities, creating distinctive images and associations in the minds of stakeholders, thereby generating economic benefits.

Brand Strength

Brand strength is the efficacy of a brand’s performance on intangible measures relative to its competitors. Brand Finance evaluates brand strength in a process compliant with ISO 20671, looking at Marketing Investment, Stakeholder Equity, and the impact of those on Business Performance. The data used is derived from Brand Finance’s proprietary market research programme and from publicly available sources.

Each brand is assigned a Brand Strength Index (BSI) score out of 100, which feeds into the brand value calculation. Based on the score, each brand is assigned a corresponding Brand Rating up to AAA+ in a format similar to a credit rating.

Brand Valuation Approach

Brand Finance calculates the values of brands in its rankings using the Royalty Relief approach – a brand valuation method compliant with the industry standards set in ISO 10668. It involves estimating the likely future revenues that are attributable to a brand by calculating a royalty rate that would be charged for its use, to arrive at a ‘brand value’ understood as a net economic benefit that a brand owner would achieve by licensing the brand in the open market.

The steps in this process are as follows:

1 Calculate brand strength using a balanced scorecard of metrics assessing Marketing Investment, Stakeholder Equity, and Business Performance. Brand strength is expressed as a Brand Strength Index (BSI) score on a scale of 0 to 100.

2 Determine royalty range for each industry, reflecting the importance of brand to purchasing decisions. In luxury, the maximum percentage is high, while in extractive industry, where goods are often commoditised, it is lower. This is done by reviewing comparable licensing agreements sourced from Brand Finance’s extensive database.

3 Calculate royalty rate. The BSI score is applied to the royalty range to arrive at a royalty rate. For example, if the royalty range in a sector is 0-5% and a brand has a BSI score of 80 out of 100, then an appropriate royalty rate for the use of this brand in the given sector will be 4%.

4 Determine brand-specific revenues by estimating a proportion of parent company revenues attributable to a brand.

5 Determine forecast revenues using a function of historic revenues, equity analyst forecasts, and economic growth rates.

6 Apply the royalty rate to the forecast revenues to derive brand revenues.

7 Discount post-tax brand revenues to a net present value which equals the brand value.

Disclaimer

Brand Finance has produced this study with an independent and unbiased analysis. The values derived and opinions presented in this study are based on publicly available information and certain assumptions that Brand Finance used where such data was deficient or unclear. Brand Finance accepts no responsibility and will not be liable in the event that the publicly available information relied upon is subsequently found to be inaccurate. The opinions and financial analysis expressed in the study are not to be construed as providing investment or business advice. Brand Finance does not intend the study to be relied upon for any reason and excludes all liability to any body, government, or organisation.

The data presented in this study form part of Brand Finance's proprietary database, are provided for the benefit of the media, and are not to be used in part or in full for any commercial or technical purpose without written permission from Brand Finance.

Get in Touch

Message