Brand Finance logo

Japan’s alcoholic drink brands show spirited growth in 2025 rankings

23 July 2025
Jump to Media Downloads

New Brand Finance data reveals four Japanese alcoholic drink brands are currently valued at $8.1 billion

  • Asahi remains Japan’s most valuable beer brand, while Kirin is strongest
  • Suntory Whisky claims top spot as Japan’s most valuable and strongest spirits brand ranked
  • Corona Extra retains its position as the world’s most valuable beer brand in 2025

TOKYO, 23 July 2025 – Four leading Japanese alcoholic drink brands are valued at USD8.1 billion in 2025, reflecting the growth of the global alcoholic drink brands ranked, according to the Alcoholic Drinks 2025 report by Brand Finance, the world’s leading brand valuation consultancy.

In the Beers 50 2025 sub-rankings, Asahi and Kirin remain as Japan’s two representatives. Asahi rose one spot to seventh, with its brand value surging 45% to USD4.6 billion. In contrast, Kirin’s brand value fell 33% to USD2.1 billion, leading to a drop of six places to 15th.

Despite this drop, Kirin managed to overtake Asahi to become the strongest Japanese beer brand ranked with a Brand Strength Index (BSI) score of 77.5/100, and an AA+ brand strength rating. Brand Finance’s research data attributes Kirin’s strength to its ubiquitous familiarity and good reputation amongst Japanese consumers.

Meanwhile, in the Spirits 50 2025 sub-rankings, two more brands represent Japan on the global stage. Suntory Whisky moves up two places to rank 32nd, with its brand value rising 28% to USD928 million. The brand’s growth is largely due to its stable financials in 2024, with a reported increase in sales in the US despite competing in a challenging market. Suntory is also Japan’s strongest whisky brand, with a BSI score of 63.8/00 and an A+ brand strength rating.

New entrant Nikka (brand value at USD566 million) claimed 49th place in the rankings. Its debut follows a strong year marked by strategic brand-building efforts, including the launch of The Nikka Whisky Tokyo, an immersive flagship bar in Omotesando that ran from August to December 2024. The brand also expanded its production capacity with new cask storage facilities at its Tochigi site, signalling long-term growth ambitions both at home and overseas.

Alex Haigh, Managing Director Asia Pacific, Brand Finance, commented:

“Japan’s alcohol brands continue to strike a balance between heritage and innovation. Their growth in a competitive global market reflects not just product quality, but also sustained investment in brand equity and consumer engagement. As global tastes evolve, Japan’s drinks brands are proving they have the strength and adaptability to stay relevant at home and abroad.”

Global Insights

Corona Extra retains its position as the world’s most valuable beer brand in 2025 for the second consecutive year, with its brand value reaching USD13.4 billion.

Jack Daniel’s continues to be the world’s most valuable whiskey brand, with a brand value of USD4.4 billion. In the vodka category, Smirnoff ((brand value up 33% to USD2.9 billion) retains its leading position, while Mexico’s Patrón tops the tequila ranking, despite a 2% dip in brand value to USD1.8 billion.

Moët & Chandon remains the world’s most valuable champagne and wine brand – a position it has held since Brand Finance introduced the Champagne & Wine 10 sub-ranking in 2020.

Media Downloads

These images may be downloaded and used for publication. Please attribute to Brand Finance.
Copyright © 2025 Brand Finance. All rights reserved.

Media Contacts

Gayathri Saravana Kumar
Marketing Director - Asia Pacific
Brand Finance

About Brand Finance

Brand Finance is the world’s leading brand valuation consultancy. Bridging the gap between marketing and finance, Brand Finance evaluates the strength of brands and quantifies their financial value to help organisations make strategic decisions.

Headquartered in London, Brand Finance operates in over 25 countries. Every year, Brand Finance conducts more than 6,000 brand valuations, supported by original market research, and publishes over 100 reports which rank brands across all sectors and countries.

Brand Finance also operates the Global Brand Equity Monitor, conducting original market research annually on 6,000 brands, surveying more than 175,000 respondents across 41 countries and 31 industry sectors. By combining perceptual data from the Global Brand Equity Monitor with data from its valuation database — the largest brand value database in the world — Brand Finance equips ambitious brand leaders with the data, analytics, and the strategic guidance they need to enhance brand and business value.

In addition to calculating brand value, Brand Finance also determines the relative strength of brands through a balanced scorecard of metrics evaluating marketing investment, stakeholder equity, and business performance, compliant with ISO 20671.

Brand Finance is a regulated accountancy firm and a committed leader in the standardisation of the brand valuation industry. Brand Finance was the first to be certified by independent auditors as compliant with both ISO 10668 and ISO 20671 and has received the official endorsement of the Marketing Accountability Standards Board (MASB) in the United States.

Definition of Brand

Brand is defined as a marketing-related intangible asset including, but not limited to, names, terms, signs, symbols, logos, and designs, intended to identify goods, services, or entities, creating distinctive images and associations in the minds of stakeholders, thereby generating economic benefits.

Brand Strength

Brand strength is the efficacy of a brand’s performance on intangible measures relative to its competitors. Brand Finance evaluates brand strength in a process compliant with ISO 20671, looking at Marketing Investment, Stakeholder Equity, and the impact of those on Business Performance. The data used is derived from Brand Finance’s proprietary market research programme and from publicly available sources.

Each brand is assigned a Brand Strength Index (BSI) score out of 100, which feeds into the brand value calculation. Based on the score, each brand is assigned a corresponding Brand Rating up to AAA+ in a format similar to a credit rating.

Brand Valuation Approach

Brand Finance calculates the values of brands in its rankings using the Royalty Relief approach – a brand valuation method compliant with the industry standards set in ISO 10668. It involves estimating the likely future revenues that are attributable to a brand by calculating a royalty rate that would be charged for its use, to arrive at a ‘brand value’ understood as a net economic benefit that a brand owner would achieve by licensing the brand in the open market.

The steps in this process are as follows:

1 Calculate brand strength using a balanced scorecard of metrics assessing Marketing Investment, Stakeholder Equity, and Business Performance. Brand strength is expressed as a Brand Strength Index (BSI) score on a scale of 0 to 100.

2 Determine royalty range for each industry, reflecting the importance of brand to purchasing decisions. In luxury, the maximum percentage is high, while in extractive industry, where goods are often commoditised, it is lower. This is done by reviewing comparable licensing agreements sourced from Brand Finance’s extensive database.

3 Calculate royalty rate. The BSI score is applied to the royalty range to arrive at a royalty rate. For example, if the royalty range in a sector is 0-5% and a brand has a BSI score of 80 out of 100, then an appropriate royalty rate for the use of this brand in the given sector will be 4%.

4 Determine brand-specific revenues by estimating a proportion of parent company revenues attributable to a brand.

5 Determine forecast revenues using a function of historic revenues, equity analyst forecasts, and economic growth rates.

6 Apply the royalty rate to the forecast revenues to derive brand revenues.

7 Discount post-tax brand revenues to a net present value which equals the brand value.

Disclaimer

Brand Finance has produced this study with an independent and unbiased analysis. The values derived and opinions presented in this study are based on publicly available information and certain assumptions that Brand Finance used where such data was deficient or unclear. Brand Finance accepts no responsibility and will not be liable in the event that the publicly available information relied upon is subsequently found to be inaccurate. The opinions and financial analysis expressed in the study are not to be construed as providing investment or business advice. Brand Finance does not intend the study to be relied upon for any reason and excludes all liability to any body, government, or organisation.

The data presented in this study form part of Brand Finance's proprietary database, are provided for the benefit of the media, and are not to be used in part or in full for any commercial or technical purpose without written permission from Brand Finance.

Get in Touch

Message