Brand Finance logo

Jollibee flies the flag for Southeast Asia in Restaurants 25 2026

05 February 2026
Jump to Media Downloads

Philippine fast-food icon strengthens global standing as restaurants sector reaches $190.1 billion

  • Jollibee is the only Philippine and Southeast Asian brand featured in the Brand Finance Restaurants 25 2026
  • Fifth strongest restaurant brand globally: Jollibee records 87.9/100 BSI score and an AAA brand strength rating
  • McDonald’s retains title as the world’s most valuable restaurant brand

MANILA, 5 February 2026 – Reinforcing its global relevance and success, Jollibee has retained its place as the Philippines’ sole representative amongst the top 25 most valuable restaurant brands globally, according to a new report from Brand Finance, the world's leading brand valuation consultancy.

The global restaurants sector continues to grow in value in 2026, driven by expansions and the normalisation of takeout, delivery, and quick-service dining. Since the first iteration of the Brand Finance Restaurants 25 report in 2015, the top 10 brands’ combined value has risen by around 20%, even as brand strength comes under increasing pressure.

In 2026, Jollibee’s brand value rose 32% to USD3.3 billion, placing it 18th among the world’s 25 most valuable restaurant brands, despite intensifying competition from larger global players. The brand also ranks as the fifth strongest restaurant brand worldwide, up four ranks from 2025, with a Brand Strength Index (BSI) score of 87.9/100 and an AAA brand strength rating, reflecting strong familiarity, advocacy and price acceptance in its home market, and other key markets like Singapore and Vietnam.

As the only Philippine and Southeast Asian brand in the global ranking, Jollibee’s performance underscores the ability of home-grown brands to compete internationally through scale, operational discipline, and deep cultural resonance. Its continued expansions across Asia, North America, and the Middle East has strengthened future earnings expectations while preserving strong brand equity in its core market.

Alex Haigh, Managing Director Asia Pacific, Brand Finance, commented:

“Restaurant brands have proven their ability to scale, but scale alone is no longer enough. As consumers become more price-conscious, maintaining trust, consistency, and perceived value will be critical to sustaining brand strength, even for the industry’s largest players.”

Global Insights:

  • Greggs and McDonald’s complete the top three strongest brands, reflecting a broader challenge in sustaining brand strength as consumers become more price conscious
  • McDonald’s, Starbucks, and KFC remain the world’s three most valuable restaurant brands, underlining the continued dominance of large, globally scaled quick-service players
  • Chick-fil-A is the fastest growing brand in the ranking, supported by strong revenues and disciplined expansion in the US
  • Haidilao remains the world’s strongest restaurant brand, although brand strength declined across most leading brands as cost pressures intensify

Media Downloads

These images may be downloaded and used for publication. Please attribute to Brand Finance.
Copyright © 2026 Brand Finance. All rights reserved.

Media Contacts

Gayathri Saravana Kumar
Marketing Director - Asia Pacific
Brand Finance

About Brand Finance

Brand Finance is the world’s leading brand valuation consultancy. Bridging the gap between marketing and finance, Brand Finance evaluates the strength of brands and quantifies their financial value to help organisations make strategic decisions.

Headquartered in London, Brand Finance operates in over 25 countries. Every year, Brand Finance conducts more than 6,000 brand valuations, supported by original market research, and publishes over 100 reports which rank brands across all sectors and countries.

Brand Finance also operates the Global Brand Equity Monitor, conducting original market research annually on 6,000 brands, surveying more than 175,000 respondents across 41 countries and 31 industry sectors. By combining perceptual data from the Global Brand Equity Monitor with data from its valuation database — the largest brand value database in the world — Brand Finance equips ambitious brand leaders with the data, analytics, and the strategic guidance they need to enhance brand and business value.

In addition to calculating brand value, Brand Finance also determines the relative strength of brands through a balanced scorecard of metrics, compliant with ISO 20671.

Brand Finance is a regulated accountancy firm and a committed leader in the standardisation of the brand valuation industry. Brand Finance was the first to be certified by independent auditors as compliant with both ISO 10668 and ISO 20671 and has received the official endorsement of the Marketing Accountability Standards Board (MASB) in the United States.

Definition of Brand

Brand is defined as a marketing-related intangible asset including, but not limited to, names, terms, signs, symbols, logos, and designs, intended to identify goods, services, or entities, creating distinctive images and associations in the minds of stakeholders, thereby generating economic benefits.

Brand Strength

Brand strength is the efficacy of a brand’s performance on intangible measures relative to its competitors. Brand Finance evaluates brand strength in a process compliant with ISO 20671, looking at Marketing Investment, Stakeholder Equity, and the impact of those on Business Performance. The data used is derived from Brand Finance’s proprietary market research programme and from publicly available sources.

Each brand is assigned a Brand Strength Index (BSI) score out of 100, which feeds into the brand value calculation. Based on the score, each brand is assigned a corresponding Brand Rating up to AAA+ in a format similar to a credit rating.

Brand Valuation Approach

Brand Finance calculates the values of brands in its rankings using the Royalty Relief approach – a brand valuation method compliant with the industry standards set in ISO 10668. It involves estimating the likely future revenues that are attributable to a brand by calculating a royalty rate that would be charged for its use, to arrive at a ‘brand value’ understood as a net economic benefit that a brand owner would achieve by licensing the brand in the open market.

The steps in this process are as follows:

1 Calculate brand strength using a balanced scorecard of metrics assessing Marketing Investment, Stakeholder Equity, and Business Performance. Brand strength is expressed as a Brand Strength Index (BSI) score on a scale of 0 to 100.

2 Determine royalty range for each industry, reflecting the importance of brand to purchasing decisions. In luxury, the maximum percentage is high, while in extractive industry, where goods are often commoditised, it is lower. This is done by reviewing comparable licensing agreements sourced from Brand Finance’s extensive database.

3 Calculate royalty rate. The BSI score is applied to the royalty range to arrive at a royalty rate. For example, if the royalty range in a sector is 0-5% and a brand has a BSI score of 80 out of 100, then an appropriate royalty rate for the use of this brand in the given sector will be 4%.

4 Determine brand-specific revenues by estimating a proportion of parent company revenues attributable to a brand.

5 Determine forecast revenues using a function of historic revenues, equity analyst forecasts, and economic growth rates.

6 Apply the royalty rate to the forecast revenues to derive brand revenues.

7 Discount post-tax brand revenues to a net present value which equals the brand value.

Disclaimer

Brand Finance has produced this study with an independent and unbiased analysis. The values derived and opinions presented in this study are based on publicly available information and certain assumptions that Brand Finance used where such data was deficient or unclear. Brand Finance accepts no responsibility and will not be liable in the event that the publicly available information relied upon is subsequently found to be inaccurate. The opinions and financial analysis expressed in the study are not to be construed as providing investment or business advice. Brand Finance does not intend the study to be relied upon for any reason and excludes all liability to any body, government, or organisation.

The data presented in this study form part of Brand Finance's proprietary database, are provided for the benefit of the media, and are not to be used in part or in full for any commercial or technical purpose without written permission from Brand Finance.

Get in Touch

Message